ttnsa.blogg.se

Audirvana plus review
Audirvana plus review




audirvana plus review

I have decided that these negative posters are mostly thread-crappers, who just want to complain about Oppo for some undisclosed reason.

audirvana plus review

Whereas, the pundits typically post one liner criticisms that do not sound sincere at all. But I finally noticed that the positive responses are all sincere, with detailed information of what and why so many listeners (and viewers) like them so much.

audirvana plus review

Each time, responses include many who agree and a few people who claim Oppo is junk. So it is you say potato, I say potatoe, but we both like french fries!Ĭlick to expand.I have posted in 2 threads now that I really like the sound of the Oppo 95, 105 and 205, close to as much as any of the best digital I have heard. I agree with you, many who think they are helping newbies with the slew of RCM and specialized tool recommendations are sometimes doing a better job of scaring them off than making converts. But my records are as clean, and my tables / carts are set up as precisely - probably more - than most with all the expensive, noisy RCMs and drawer full of 1000's of dollars in un-necessary tools. I marvel at all the doo-dads, etc people think they need. I clean by hand, set up with simple tools, and have taught and / or posted the "simpler is better" moniker for quite some time. but I do own a lot of TT's, cartridges and LP's and set them all up, clean and play them with the simplest means and methods possible. Personally - I don't own any protractors, statics guns, special tools, RCM machines., etc, etc, etc, yada, yada. So no need to disagree - we agree on premise and principle - it is just a word or semantics where we differ. Click to expand.Everything you said after that sentence I agree with.






Audirvana plus review